ISA Interchange

Welcome to the official blog of the International Society of Automation (ISA).

This blog covers numerous topics on industrial automation such as operations & management, continuous & batch processing, connectivity, manufacturing & machine control, and Industry 4.0.

The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. ISA blog posts may be authored by ISA staff and guest authors from the automation community. Views and opinions expressed by a guest author are solely their own, and do not necessarily represent those of ISA. Posts made by guest authors have been subject to peer review.

All Posts

AutoQuiz: What Are Common Terms Used to Quantify Dangerous Industrial Failures?

 

AutoQuiz is edited by Joel Don, ISA's social media community manager.

 

This automation industry quiz question comes from the ISA Certified Automation Professional (CAP) certification program. ISA CAP certification provides a non-biased, third-party, objective assessment and confirmation of an automation professional's skills. The CAP exam is focused on direction, definition, design, development/application, deployment, documentation, and support of systems, software, and equipment used in control systems, manufacturing information systems, systems integration, and operational consulting. Click this link for more information about the CAP program.

 

 

Common terms used to quantify dangerous failures include which of the following?

a) probability of failure on demand (PFD) and nuisance trip rates
b) probability of failure on demand (PFD), risk reduction factor (RRF), and safety availability (SA)
c) mean time between failure, spurious (MTBFsp); nuisance trip rates; and safety availability (SA)
d) mean time between failure, spurious (MTBFsp) and risk reduction factor (RRF)
e) none of the above

 

PFD, RRF, and SA are extremely important in quantifying dangerous failures.

  • Probability of failure on demand: A value that indicates the probability of a system failing to respond to demand when a failure occurs.
  • Risk reduction factor: RRF = 1/PFD
  • Safety availability: SA = 1 – PFD

The correct answer is B, probability of failure on demand (PFD), risk reduction factor (RRF), and safety availability (SA). Spurious trips and nuisance trips are indicative of “safe” failure modes, not “dangerous” failures. This makes answers A, C, and D incorrect.

Reference: ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004 standard

 

 

About the Editor
Joel Don is the community manager for ISA and is an independent content marketing, social media and public relations consultant. Prior to his work in marketing and PR, Joel served as an editor for regional newspapers and national magazines throughout the U.S. He earned a master's degree from the Medill School at Northwestern University with a focus on science, engineering and biomedical marketing communications, and a bachelor of science degree from UC San Diego.

 

Connect with Joel
LinkedInTwitterEmail

 

 

Joel Don
Joel Don
Joel Don is an independent content marketing, social media and public relations consultant. Prior to his work in marketing and PR, Joel served as an editor for regional newspapers and national magazines throughout the U.S. He earned a master's degree from the Medill School at Northwestern University with a focus on science, engineering and biomedical marketing communications, and a bachelor of science degree from UC San Diego.

Related Posts

Ask the Automation Pros: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Process Control

The following discussion is part of an occasional series, "Ask the Automation Pros," authored by Greg McM...
Greg McMillan Nov 12, 2024 4:30:00 PM

Protecting Electrical Terminal Blocks From Tampering

Electrical terminal blocks are a common sight in the automation world. Usually mounted on DIN rail in ind...
Anna Goncharova Nov 8, 2024 10:30:00 AM

How to Access ISA Technical Content

You Have Questions? ISA Has Answers. Serving up member-generated technical content related to standards, ...
Renee Bassett Nov 5, 2024 7:00:00 AM