ISA Interchange

Welcome to the official blog of the International Society of Automation (ISA).

This blog covers numerous topics on industrial automation such as operations & management, continuous & batch processing, connectivity, manufacturing & machine control, and Industry 4.0.

The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. ISA blog posts may be authored by ISA staff and guest authors from the automation community. Views and opinions expressed by a guest author are solely their own, and do not necessarily represent those of ISA. Posts made by guest authors have been subject to peer review.

All Posts

What Process and Equipment Effects Need More Attention?

The following discussion is part of an occasional series showcasing the ISA Mentor Program, authored by Greg McMillan, industry consultant, author of numerous process control books, 2010 ISA Life Achievement Award recipient, and retired Senior Fellow from Solutia, Inc. (now Eastman Chemical). Greg will be posting questions and responses from the ISA Mentor Program, with contributions from program participants.

Greg McMillan’s Question 

What can be done to better understand and address how process and equipment design and operating conditions, including production rate, affect automation system design, installation, and performance? 

For example, what are the issues with sensors and valves in terms of seeing and affecting what is really going on and the ability of controllers to deal with load disturbances, particularly in terms of dealing with poor mixing, fouling, or frosting of heat transfer surfaces and extremely low and high production rates? 

Mark Darby’s Answer 

Process control consultants encounter plant design issues or problems that negatively impact how well the process controls can perform, or worse, lead to operating problems. A frequently encountered challenge with distillation columns is a lack of a sensitive tray temperature for control. For example, only a bottom or reboiler return temperature or a tray temperature that is no longer sensitive due to a change in operation (such as due to a change in product specification) is available (without any other thermowells). 

Another challenge is with a control valve located in the wrong location. One I recently encountered used a cold stream in a cryogenic process to precool the entering feed, and the control valve for temperature control was on the inlet to the exchanger instead of on the outlet. Due to pressure drops across the control valve, further cooling of the cold stream made hydrate formation more likely. The control valve was operated in a fixed position that kept the temperature in a feasible range, but with increased variability of the outlet temperature of the existing hot stream. 

Doug Nicholson’s Answer

The challenges of retraying a large column to obtain a capacity increase can sometimes go spectacularly wrong. I’ve seen cases where a retray (which took an extended shutdown to install) results in a lower capacity column due to downcomer flooding. The plant may not be able to afford the duration and with risk of another shutdown to repair the problem they may be forced to build a new column at great expense. Be careful with retrays that go to the limit. 

Another challenge can be if the wrong type of instrument or analyzer is specified so it cannot be used. A challenge with cracking furnaces in an ethylene plant can be the variable heating value of the fuel gas stream due to changes in the fuel hydrogen content. In a plant I recently worked in, a continuous Wobbe index analyzer for fuel gas heating value was installed as a feedforward to all furnaces. Unfortunately, the delay in the measurement made it useless for feedforward control. In this case, a fuel gas heating value disturbance was seen in the furnace coil outlet temperature at four minutes and was nearly over before the Wobbe meter said something was happening. A less accurate but better option is to use a fast density analyzer to infer heating value, but watch out when using a single measurement that is fanned out to all fired heaters. A false reading or clumsy maintenance could cause a big disturbance with a significant risk to the integrity of the fired heaters. 

Mark Darby’s Response

In response to the aforementioned challenges, I would just like to emphasize that it is important to plan and budget fixes to correct for design issues, both plant and instrumentation. 

George Buckbee’s Answer

Well, this is a broad question, and we could go in many directions! I will suggest a few topics related to short-term and long-term effects that can affect process performance and control performance. There are so many variations on the topic, especially when you consider many different industries. So, I have included a few examples. 

Short-term process changes may include changes in: 

  • Production rate
  • Product schedule (especially important in paper, specialty chemicals, and foods)
  • Production recipe (including changes to raw materials, fuel sources, or re-blending, for example)
  • Weather (especially for processes where raw materials are stored outdoors) 

These changes are either operator-controlled and/or easily observed, so plant personnel know when they happen. Yet, control systems are not always configured to adjust to the new process conditions. For more optimal performance, consider adapting controller gains and adjusting alarm limits for each new set of conditions. Historical process data can be very helpful with this. 

Short-term equipment changes may include changes to equipment settings, replacement or repair of parts (i.e., filters), catalyst poisoning, or sudden equipment failures. These changes are harder to detect and represent a key opportunity in automated diagnostics. Industrial internet of things (IIoT), digital twins, and smart sensors can play some role in this arena. 

Longer-term effects may include some combination of process and equipment changes, such as: 

  • Heat exchanger fouling
  • Boiler tube plugging
  • Catalyst deactivation
  • Effects of seasons 

These effects generally follow predictable patterns and are often handled procedurally with scheduled process adjustments or inspections. However, with smart sensors and predictors, there is a great opportunity for automated detection, mitigation, and reporting. More attention in this area can prevent gradual declines in performance. 

Greg McMillan’s Answer

The effect of production rate on the open loop dynamics greatly depends on whether the process equipment is in-line with essentially plug flow, (e.g., static mixers, coils, heat exchangers, centrifuges, dryers, extruders, sheet lines, etc.) is a well-mixed volume (e.g., bioreactors, neutralizers, reactors, etc.), or is something in between with some (but not complete) back mixing due to recirculation lines (e.g., evaporators, crystallizers, distillation columns, etc.). In all cases, the process gain for temperature and composition control is inversely proportional to production rate. For plug flow, the process dead time is proportional to production rate due to transportation delay. For a well-mixed volume, the process dead time set by mixing (e.g., turnover time) remains about the same but the residence time and hence the primary process time constant is inversely proportional to production rate. Thus, for a plug flow volume, there is a double whammy of an increase in process gain and process dead time for a decrease in production rate. For heat exchanger temperature control, the effect is somewhat moderated by the increase in the thermal lag from a decrease in heat transfer coefficient for a decrease in feed rate. For a well-mixed volume, the increase in process gain is compensated by the increased primary process time constant in the PID tuning for lag dominant processes (near-integrating processes). 

ISA 5.9 PID Algorithms and Performance Technical Report Annex F provides the development and deeper understanding of these relationships from material and energy balances. Charge balances that include the extraordinary, often neglected moderating effect of carbon dioxide absorption and conjugate salts are needed to detail the process gain nonlinearity of pH systems seen in the slope of the titration curve. First principle dynamic models with energy, material, and charge balances greatly help in quantifying and exploring the changes in process dynamics with process and equipment conditions and operating rates. 

Thermowells can add a huge measurement lag that in lag-dominant processes shows up as additional dead time. A loose-fitting sensing element that is not touching the bottom of the thermowell and to a lesser extent a large thermowell diameter increase the lag. A spring-loaded element in a tapered thermowell with a tip in a representative process stream is the best practice for minimizing the measurement lag. Low fluid velocity increases the sensor lag and the possibility of additional lag from fouling particularly for pH electrodes, but also for temperature sensors. 

Control valves can add a considerable lag and delay due to poor precision and response time. Poor precision originates from resolution limits associated with stiction and from lost motion due to backlash. Resolution and lost motion also cause limit cycles when there is one, two, or more points of integrating action, respectively in the loop (process, positioner, controller(s), etc.). See the newly drafted Annex A in the ISA technical report TR75.25.02 (2022) for more details. 

Flow measurements are notorious for becoming noisy and inaccurate at low production rates, particularly with differential head and vortex meters since their accuracy is in percent of span and they are severely affected by low velocities, composition changes, and piping discontinuities. Magnetic flow meters and Coriolis meters have accuracies in percent of reading and have much greater rangeability and resilience, making them the best choice to deal with changes in process conditions and flowrate. These meters have no straight run or velocity profile requirements and have a rangeability and low flow accuracy one to two orders of magnitude better.

Greg McMillan
Greg McMillan
Gregory K. McMillan, CAP, is a retired Senior Fellow from Solutia/Monsanto where he worked in engineering technology on process control improvement. Greg was also an affiliate professor for Washington University in Saint Louis. Greg is an ISA Fellow and received the ISA Kermit Fischer Environmental Award for pH control in 1991, the Control magazine Engineer of the Year award for the process industry in 1994, was inducted into the Control magazine Process Automation Hall of Fame in 2001, was honored by InTech magazine in 2003 as one of the most influential innovators in automation, and received the ISA Life Achievement Award in 2010. Greg is the author of numerous books on process control, including Advances in Reactor Measurement and Control and Essentials of Modern Measurements and Final Elements in the Process Industry. Greg has been the monthly "Control Talk" columnist for Control magazine since 2002. Presently, Greg is a part time modeling and control consultant in Technology for Process Simulation for Emerson Automation Solutions specializing in the use of the digital twin for exploring new opportunities.

Related Posts

The Future of Automation in the Workforce—What Do We Need to Know?

The automation profession has always been in a state of constant evolution. In the early days, automation...
Steve Mustard May 30, 2023 3:50:56 PM

Five Benefits of Cloud Managed Services and Cloud Cost Monitoring

No matter the size of your business, IT leaders and CIOs increasingly recognize the benefits of leveragin...
Denise Kee May 26, 2023 3:03:05 PM

Automation Doesn’t Deserve its Bad Reputation

Automation gets a bad rap from many quarters. Politicians blame automation for the loss of manufacturing ...
Steve Mustard May 23, 2023 1:21:57 PM