ISA Interchange

Welcome to the official blog of the International Society of Automation (ISA).

This blog covers numerous topics on industrial automation such as operations & management, continuous & batch processing, connectivity, manufacturing & machine control, and Industry 4.0.

The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. ISA blog posts may be authored by ISA staff and guest authors from the automation community. Views and opinions expressed by a guest author are solely their own, and do not necessarily represent those of ISA. Posts made by guest authors have been subject to peer review.

All Posts

Webinar Recording: Three Common Pitfalls of Pressure Calibration


This guest post was authored by Roy Tomalino, professional services engineer at Beamex, in conjunction with an ISA co-hosted webinar on smart instrumentation calibration. Click this link to watch Part 2 of the ISA co-hosted webinar series focusing on how to avoid the pitfalls of implementing a calibration process change.


Editor's Note: This is Part 1 of a two-part series on avoiding the pitfalls of implementing a calibration process change. To watch Part 2, click this link.


You are in Building 27 on the third floor. It is time to calibrate a pressure transmitter. You have just finished the highest pressure point of the test. Now, it’s time to bring it back down. The easiest way to reduce the pressure is to vent the pressure pump. So, when you vent the pump, there is process fluid everywhere. That is not what you expected. How did this happen?

Calibrating pressure instruments has its own unique challenges. For example, during pressure instrument calibration when process fluid erupts from the instrument, it can be a big mess to clean up. To avoid this literal mess and improper calibrations, there some sensible tips and principles to take into account.

Here are three of the most common pitfalls that occur during pressure calibrations:

1) One such challenge is knowing where to vent after you have pressured up your test line. In the scenario described above, a three-legged hose is used with one end going to the device under test (DUT), one end to the pressure source (a hand pump, in this case) and one end to the pressure port on the calibrator. Venting a line under pressure creates a low pressure area similar to a vacuum effect on the contents of the line. It could be atmospheric air, nitrogen from a bottle or a process fluid (if present in the line, capillary or bourdon tube). If the process fluid is corrosive or dangerous, this can be an especially bad situation. Now you have to clean out the pump and probably the pressure transducer. However, you can avoid this in the future by venting at the DUT.

2) Another common challenge is finding zero. Isn’t zero always a mathematical zero? No. Not when you are dealing with gauge pressure. Absolute pressure has a zero, which would be a perfect vacuum found in space. When you zero a gauge pressure instrument, you zero it to the atmospheric pressure at that moment. Because this barometric pressure changes, your zero changes. This should be accounted for as a slight deviation due to random error in the process tolerance.

3) In looking further at pressure testing, the orientation of your DUT plays an important role during calibration and installation. A common design of pressure transmitters is to use a protective diaphragm seal with silicone fluid on the other side to register the pressure applied to the actual instrument sensor. Gravity will have an effect on the measurement with this arrangement. To demonstrate this effect, calibrate a pressure transmitter lying flat in a horizontal position. Then, simply change the position of the DUT to upright or vertical and run the test points again. You will notice a dramatic effect.

Although there are other factors to consider, identifying where to vent the line, understanding the type of pressure being measured and the orientation of the DUT will help you sidestep some of the most common challenges in pressure instrument calibration. When you vent the line at the DUT, catastrophic messes are circumvented.

Measurements are the most accurate when you understand the type of pressure you are working with. Calibrating the instrument in the same position as it is installed will help ensure that calibration is completed correctly. Overall, avoiding these common mistakes will save you time, as well as improve quality and accuracy of calibrations.

Click this link to watch Part 2 of the ISA co-hosted webinar series focusing on how to avoid the pitfalls of implementing a calibration process change.


Blog Posts
How Often Do Measurements Need to Be Calibrated?
Just in Time, or Just Too Late? A Kaizen Approach to Calibration
How to Improve Industrial Productivity with Loop Calibration
Temperature Calibration: Using a Dry Block to Calculate Total Uncertainty
How Can Advanced Calibration Strategies Improve Control Performance?
How to Calibrate a Pressure Transmitter

Webinar Recordings
Uncertainty in Calibration
Calibration Uncertainty and Why Technicians Need to Understand It
How to Avoid the Most Common Mistakes in Field Calibration
Learn Advanced Techniques in Field Calibration
How to Build an Industrial Calibration System Business Case
How to Use Calibration Tools for Accurate Process Temperature Measurement
How Does Low Flow Affect Differential Pressure Flowmeter Calibration?
Three Common Pitfalls of Pressure Calibration
Webinar Recording: How to Calibrate Differential Pressure Flowmeters

Free Downloads
ISA Industrial Calibration Worksheets
Measurement Uncertainty Analysis Excel template plus book excerpt
Calibration Handbook of Measuring Instruments book excerpt
In-Depth Guide to Calibration for the Process Industries eBook
Calibration Uncertainty for Non-Mathematicians white paper


About the Presenter
Roy Tomalino has been teaching calibration management for 14 years. Throughout his career, he has taught on four different continents to people from over 40 countries. His previous roles include technical marketing engineer and worldwide trainer for Hewlett-Packard and application engineer with Honeywell. Today, Roy is responsible for all Beamex training activities in North America.


Connect with Roy



Related Posts

5 Ways Manufacturers Can Protect Their IP

Industry 4.0 is defined by the marriage of the digital and the physical, taking the form of smart factori...
Emily Newton Aug 16, 2022 5:30:00 AM

IDM Can Improve Plant Reliability and Reduce Downtime

There are hundreds of smart instruments including sensors and final control elements installed in medium-...
Bakhtiar Pour Ahmad Aug 12, 2022 5:30:00 AM

The Opportunities and Obstacles in Using Automation for PCB Assembly

Automation has revolutionized the printed circuit board (PCB) industry with enhanced product reliability ...
Suresh Patel Aug 9, 2022 5:30:00 AM