ISA Interchange

Welcome to the official blog of the International Society of Automation (ISA).

This blog covers numerous topics on industrial automation such as operations & management, continuous & batch processing, connectivity, manufacturing & machine control, and Industry 4.0.

The material and information contained on this website is for general information purposes only. ISA blog posts may be authored by ISA staff and guest authors from the automation community. Views and opinions expressed by a guest author are solely their own, and do not necessarily represent those of ISA. Posts made by guest authors have been subject to peer review.

All Posts

AutoQuiz: How to Simultaneously Optimize an Interacting Dead-Time Dominant Process with Multiple Constraints

AutoQuiz is edited by Joel Don, ISA's social media community manager.

Today's automation industry quiz question comes from the ISA Certified Automation Professional certification program. ISA CAP certification provides a non-biased, third-party, objective assessment and confirmation of an automation professional's skills. The CAP exam is focused on direction, definition, design, development/application, deployment, documentation, and support of systems, software, and equipment used in control systems, manufacturing information systems, systems integration, and operational consulting. Click this link for information about the CAP program. The following question comes from the CAP study guide, Performance Domain VI, Operations and Maintenance. Long-term support of the system.

 

To simultaneously optimize an interacting dead-time dominant process with multiple constraints, one should use a(n):

a) override PID control
b) model predictive control
c) decoupled PID control
d) advisory control
e) none of the above

 Model predictive control (MPC) excels at dead-time dominance and simultaneous optimization while accounting for future prediction of proximity to constraints.

PID (answers A and C) controllers are not suitable dead-time dominance. Derivatives cannot serve, and PID controllers do not perform as well as MPCs. Override controllers select a single PID output and are not simultaneous. PID controllers simply do not work well enough.

Decoupling is limited in practice to steady state gains and a small number of variables with no optimization built in. Operators cannot handle the interactions, the dead time, or provide minute-to-minute simultaneous corrections even if they receive regular and new set points.

Advisory control is not an entity and is therefore not the answer.

The best answer is B, model predictive control.

Joel Don
Joel Don
Joel Don is an independent content marketing, social media and public relations consultant. Prior to his work in marketing and PR, Joel served as an editor for regional newspapers and national magazines throughout the U.S. He earned a master's degree from the Medill School at Northwestern University with a focus on science, engineering and biomedical marketing communications, and a bachelor of science degree from UC San Diego.

Related Posts

Checking In With Mimo, ISA's Large Language Model Trained on ISA Content

Over the summer of 2024, the International Society of Automation (ISA) announced a large language model (...
Kara Phelps Nov 15, 2024 7:00:00 AM

Ask the Automation Pros: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Process Control

The following discussion is part of an occasional series, "Ask the Automation Pros," authored by Greg McM...
Greg McMillan Nov 12, 2024 4:30:00 PM

Protecting Electrical Terminal Blocks From Tampering

Electrical terminal blocks are a common sight in the automation world. Usually mounted on DIN rail in ind...
Anna Goncharova Nov 8, 2024 10:30:00 AM