ISA Interchange

Welcome to the official blog of the International Society of Automation (ISA).

All Posts

AutoQuiz: What Are Acceptable Hazardous Location Protection Techniques for Industrial Areas?

AutoQuiz is edited by Joel Don, ISA's social media community manager.

Today's automation industry quiz question comes from the ISA Certified Automation Professional certification program. ISA CAP certification provides a non-biased, third-party, objective assessment and confirmation of an automation professional's skills. The CAP exam is focused on direction, definition, design, development/application, deployment, documentation, and support of systems, software, and equipment used in control systems, manufacturing information systems, systems integration, and operational consulting. Click this link for more information about the CAP program. The following question comes from the CAP study guide, Performance Domain III, System Design.

Which of the following protection techniques is acceptable for equipment located in a Class I, Division 1 area?

a) explosion-proof apparatus and nonincendive equipment
b) explosion-proof apparatus and intrinsic safety
c) dust ignition-proof and nonincendive equipment
d) hermetically sealed and intrinsic safety
e) none of the above

    Hazardous location protection techniques are defined by NEC 500.7 (NEC 2002 Code). The protection techniques are permitted as follows:

  • Explosion proof apparatus: Class I, Div1 or 2
  • Intrinsic safety: Class I, Div 1 or2; Class II Div 1 or 2; or Class III, Div 1 or 2
  • Non-incendive equipment: Class I, Div 2; Class II, Div 2; or Class III, Div 1 or 2 (Does NOT Include Class 1, Div 1)
    Dust ignition proof: Class II, Div 1 or 2 (Does NOT include Class I, Div 1)
  • Hermetically sealed: Class I, Div 2; Class II, Div 2; or Class III, Div 1 or 2 (Does NOT include Class I, Div 1)

Reference: Earley, NEC 2002 Handbook, NFPA, 2002

The operational definitions of explosion proof and intrinsically safe are useful in this context. An explosion proof apparatus is one enclosed in a case that is capable of withstanding an explosion of a specified gas or vapor that may occur within it and of preventing the ignition of a specified gas or vapor surrounding the enclosure by sparks, flashes, or explosion of the gas or vapor within and that operates at such an external temperature that a surrounding flammable atmosphere will not be ignited thereby.

An intrinsically safe apparatus is one in which all the electrical circuits are intrinsically safe, which is to say the power that courses through the circuit is incapable of causing ignition of a mixture of flammable or combustible material in which the circuit is operating.

The correct answer is B, explosion-proof apparatus and intrinsic safety.

Joel Don
Joel Don
Joel Don is an independent content marketing, social media and public relations consultant. Prior to his work in marketing and PR, Joel served as an editor for regional newspapers and national magazines throughout the U.S. He earned a master's degree from the Medill School at Northwestern University with a focus on science, engineering and biomedical marketing communications, and a bachelor of science degree from UC San Diego.

Related Posts

Cobots Help Manufacturers Succeed In Light of the Pandemic

By Emily Newton   The manufacturing industry has been hit especially hard by the pandemic. There’s the ob...
Contributing Author Feb 23, 2021 5:00:00 AM

Digitalization of Production Facilities

By Anil Pushkaran   The term “digitalization” (or the phrase “digital transformation”) has different mean...
Contributing Author Feb 19, 2021 5:30:00 AM

What Is Fog Computing?

By Ryan Warrington   Before explaining fog computing, we need to make sure we have a solid understanding ...
Contributing Author Feb 16, 2021 5:15:00 AM